We could ask for advice from other project developers that have succeeded on their own journey.
"mold is a faster drop-in replacement for existing Unix linkers. It is several times faster than the LLVM lld linker, the second-fastest open-source linker which I originally created a few years ago. mold is designed to increase developer productivity by reducing build time, especially in rapid debug-edit-rebuild cycles."
I don't understand how things like this still manage to front-page without a cursory explanation.
Using Mold [0] as the linker might help. Written by the author of lld.
Program (linker output size): GNU gold | LLVM lld | mold
Chrome 96 (1.89 GiB): 53.86s | 11.74s | 2.21s
Clang 13 (3.18 GiB): 64.12s | 5.82s | 2.90s
Firefox 89 libxul (1.64 GiB): 32.95s | 6.80s | 1.42s
[0] https://github.com/rui314/moldedit: add citation, info, times, link, will -> might, and formatting.
Does it, though?
I mean, if you read that link you'll notice it boasts the linker's performance by comparing it with cp and how it's "so fast that it is only 2x slower than cp on the same machine."
Is cp supposed to be CPU-bound?
There is Mold (https://github.com/rui314/mold) as an alternative but it doesn’t support MacOS yet and that’s a blocker for our team.