What does HackerNews think of ziglyph?

The stdlib is not yet the focus of development so we don't know precisely what should or should not be in the stdlib.

This library implements the unicode spec and there have been talks about upstreaming it into the stdlib, but no decisions yet.

https://github.com/jecolon/ziglyph

Well, there's functions for working with code points within the bytes that (may) make up utf8 strings.. in order to do actual string level manipulation a library is needed (such as https://github.com/jecolon/ziglyph or others)

> My big problem with Zig is that Andrew Kelley is promising a lot of features, but doesn't really deliver much.

Have you, like, seen the release notes for 0.9.0?

https://ziglang.org/download/0.9.0/release-notes.html

> Zig still can't proper handle UTF-8 strings [1] in 2022

There's plenty of discussion on the subject in basically every HN thread about Zig: the stdlib has some utf8 and wtf validation code, ziglyph implements the full unicode spec.

https://github.com/jecolon/ziglyph

You might not like how it's done, but its factually incorrect to state that Zig can't handle unicode.

> In a `recent` interview[2], he claims that Zig is faster than C and Rust, but he refers to extremely short benchmarking that has almost no value in the real world.

From my reddit reply to this same topic:

This podcast interview might not be the best showcase of the practical implications of Zig's take on safety and performance. If you want something with more meat, I highly recommend Andrew's recent talk from Handmade Seattle, where he shows the work being done on the Zig self-hosted compiler.

https://media.handmade-seattle.com/practical-data-oriented-d...

Lots of bit fiddling that can't be fully proven safe statically, but then you get a compiler capable of compiling Zig code stupidly fast, and that's even without factoring in incremental compilation with in-place binary patching, with which we're aiming for sub-millisecond rebuilds of arbitrarily large projects.

> The ecosystem for zig is insignificant now and a stable release would help the language.

I hope you don't mind if we don't take this advice, given the overall tone of your post.

for strings, these might be good (haven't tried them yet): https://github.com/jecolon/zigstr https://github.com/jecolon/ziglyph

Agreed, and Zig also has a lib for that as well:

https://github.com/jecolon/ziglyph/