What does HackerNews think of price-transparency-guide?
The technical implementation guide for the tri-departmental price transparency rule.
If you want to get a sense of what a correct, properly labeled example might look like, you should visit the CMS's guidance [1]. Health insurers should be providing documents that follow the format described there, and most importantly, reporting values that are accurate.
https://github.com/CMSgov/price-transparency-guide/tree/mast...
Along with this fantastic guide:
https://github.com/CMSgov/price-transparency-guide
I recommend them to anyone who wants to see good examples of price transparency.
Please take a look at the CMS Price Transparency Guide https://github.com/CMSgov/price-transparency-guide and familiarize yourself with the schema. You can also take a look at the federal ruling: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-45/subtitle-A/subchapter-...
The metadata you're talking about is specified in the files themselves. I've limited my search to fee-for-service (non-capitated, non-derived, non-bundled) institutional claims.
You can write to me if you have more questions. [email protected]
Look up price transparency by CMS (the data will be published in this format: https://github.com/CMSgov/price-transparency-guide)
Note: the data being published by payors in machine readable format (MRF) is MASSIVE - terrabytes of data. Example: https://transparency-in-coverage.uhc.com/
Section: Overview
> All machine-readable files must [...] made available to the public without restrictions that would impede the re-use of that information.
Section: Public Discoverability
> These machine-readable files post made available to the public without restrictions that would impede the re-use of that information.