What does HackerNews think of shell_gpt?
A command-line productivity tool powered by GPT-3 and GPT-4, will help you accomplish your tasks faster and more efficiently.
Language:
Python
How is this different from ShellGPT - https://github.com/TheR1D/shell_gpt ?
I use a random one [1], when I remember. Type what I need in english and press Ctrl-G:
~/ git clean branch⌛ (ctrl-g gives me the little hourglass)
~/ git clean -f -d && git checkout branch
For people who use terminal a lot, I find shell gpt a good mixture [1]. Flexible enough to pipe commands, generic enough to ask questions.
https://github.com/TheR1D/shell_gpt already exists
ShellGPT https://github.com/TheR1D/shell_gpt does pretty well for a lot of use cases. I mostly use it in REPL mode, switching topics as needed. I have wrappers around the `sgpt` command to, say, start a REPL with a particular topic, say, Python, which loads my previous history on that topic as part of the prompt.
I also have an alias to save existing chats as text files so I can go back and review history.
Finally, there is an alias to load a question up in an editor if I need to enter multiline text, e.g. to discuss code fragments, etc.
I expect command-line workflows to be pretty individualized and I'm curious what others do. For me (old programmer), using a command line REPL feels much more natural (and blissfully noise-free) than going to a Web page to talk to, say, ChatGPT.
The API still works. I've been using https://github.com/TheR1D/shell_gpt/ in my workflow.
I recommend shell-gpt[1] for anyone with access to the OpenAI API. It works surprisingly well considering how simple it is. Be sure to browse the examples in the README.
There is also ShellGPT: https://github.com/TheR1D/shell_gpt/
This looks similar to shell_gpt[0], does yours do anything differently?