What does HackerNews think of rake?

A make-like build utility for Ruby.

Language: Ruby

#93 in Hacktoberfest
#13 in Ruby
Rake[0] is still the best ‘make-like’ build tool/task runner I’ve used for general purpose stuff. The syntax is nice and it’s just Ruby which is a delight. I briefly used Mage (similar, but Go) and it was fine too.

[0]: https://github.com/ruby/rake

This project does look cool, I'll probably give it a whirl too.

If you're open to ruby, rake is an awesome and powerful tool that is a ruby DSL implementation of make. Learning rake was one of the best investments I made. Even tho I'm a polyglot these days, I still often use rake, even tho it does make some golang people vomit :-)

https://github.com/ruby/rake

I agree there's a decent correlation. There are a few notable exceptions/edge cases. For example, Ruby's rake has just ~1,300 stars:

https://github.com/ruby/rake

It'd be an interesting project to compare frameworks/tools by aggregating the stars (or whatever metric) of its major (i.e. filtering out hobby forks and skeleton repos) dependent projects, e.g. the 22K stars of gatsbyjs/gatsby would count towards React's overall reach/popularity.

If you have multiple HTML pages, using a templating engine saves a lot of copy/pasting when you change headers, menus etc. (in the article they're using Hugo).

You can automate the uploading of files by writing a script to upload the files to the bucket so you can deploy in a single command (it gets trickier if you want to do a sync and delete files).

Personally I use rake [0] to create build and deploy tasks so I can do `rake build` and `rake deploy:prod`.

[0] https://github.com/ruby/rake

While there is a mention of Hacker News, I was surprised to see that the authors apparently hadn't attempted to correlate popularity with Reddit links. Anything that I've had become remotely popular is because it got a few upvotes on HN or Reddit...and anecdotally, I've seen Reddit/HN launch niche libraries into the 1000+ star group, even if the library is relatively niche (hell, I'll star things that look cool and had interesting discussion, even if it's likely I'll never clone/fork the repo)

Meanwhile, libraries that were ubiquitous by the time Github became popular have relatively few stars. The most prominent example in my mind is ruby/rake, which has just 627 stars: https://github.com/ruby/rake

I've always wondered why rake isn't more popular.

It's very make-like and simple, but with the advantage of a fully-featured scripting language.

https://github.com/ruby/rake