What does HackerNews think of alternative-front-ends?

Overview of alternative open source front-ends for popular internet platforms (e.g. YouTube, Twitter, etc.)

#18 in Awesome Lists
#17 in Awesome Lists
#4 in Front end
#7 in Twitter
I use Tor for everything that doesn't require identification, and I use very few of those services. For example, this HN account and the email for it have never been used without connecting through Tor. Feel free to ask me anything.

>There are sites that I have been unable to get working

This happens, most of the time because of Cloudflare. A solution is to get a new Tor circuit 3-5 times, and then the page will load. If a site simply won't work, like Meta platforms I won't use them. Using alternative front-ends[1] makes most sites that usually wouldn't work, work as well.

>The Tor browser does help here, by not easily allowing obvious mistakes like using http.

This is false, HTTPS only is enabled by default in Tor Browser. It's common knowledge for everyone including users of Google Chrome and Firefox to not use HTTP sites.

[1]: https://github.com/mendel5/alternative-front-ends

Yeah it's freaking ridiculous.

There's an alternative world of frontends that don't suck. Check here

https://github.com/mendel5/alternative-front-ends

Here's a great compilation of privacy-preserving, JS-free front-ends for many popular sites like Twitter, Reddit, Youtube, and more: https://github.com/mendel5/alternative-front-ends