What does HackerNews think of exodus?
Painless relocation of Linux binaries–and all of their dependencies–without containers.
exodus jq | ssh my-server
Exodus – relocation of Linux binaries–and all of their deps–without containers - https://github.com/intoli/exodus
ssh carthoris ls /mnt/media/Movies | grep Spider
(this is just an example). Note that in this example, we have two processes running on two different machines. Indeed, the OSs and systems on these machines may be, um... different. Indeed, I routinely include "cloud" machines in pipelines. Indeed, with ssh, the -Y (or -X) option can introduce a GUI to a part of the command.
I have wished that shar was part of SUS. Also, I find that "exodus" is useful (across Linux anyway -- the systems have to be "reasonably" homogenous). https://github.com/intoli/exodus
[1] - https://github.com/awslabs/aws-serverless-express
[2] - https://github.com/intoli/exodus
> Painless relocation of Linux binaries–and all of their dependencies–without containers.
> Exodus handles bundling all of the binary's dependencies, compiling a statically linked wrapper for the executable that invokes the relocated linker directly.
"Painless relocation of Linux binaries–and all of their dependencies–without containers."
I could actually see it being used in conjunction with a script like qpkg, where the script handles compilation and then invokes Exodus to produces self-contained bundles with all of the necessary dependencies. Exodus is generally agnostic to how software it bundles was initially installed or compiled, which has lead to some interesting use cases. For example, we've had a number of people use Docker images to install software from Debian or Alpine package repositories, and then use Exodus to repackage single applications to run in microcontainers.