What does HackerNews think of functional-programming-jargon?
Jargon from the functional programming world in simple terms!
No idea what your comment about jack shit is about. Haskell is often just as bad as Ramda.
Edit. By the way. All the unusable and unreadable jargon that Haskell uses can be much more easily explained with Javascript: https://github.com/hemanth/functional-programming-jargon Make of it what you will
functional programming jargon: https://github.com/hemanth/functional-programming-jargon
practicing data structures (programming languages): https://opendsa-server.cs.vt.edu/
https://opendsa-server.cs.vt.edu/OpenDSA/Books/PL/html/index.html
https://github.com/CodyReichert/awesome-cl#data-structuresSome people have noted that not all definitions are complete or accurate, with many missing altogether. Despite that, it is a pretty good starting point.
:)
Basically every obscure overly complicated concept that Haskell throws at you (all the while pretending to be the only true FP language out there) can be explained in 5 to 10 lines of Javascript: https://github.com/hemanth/functional-programming-jargon
Compare and contrast.
- Monad explained in Javascript: https://github.com/hemanth/functional-programming-jargon#mon...
- Timeline (sic!) of monad tutorials for Haskell: https://wiki.haskell.org/Monad_tutorials_timeline
The worst crime against humanity though is Haskell crap seeping into other languages (such as ramda, for instance: http://ramdajs.com)