What does HackerNews think of lightning?
Core Lightning — Lightning Network implementation focusing on spec compliance and performance
- Onion Routing Protocol: https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lightning-rfc/blob/maste...
- P2P Node and Channel Discovery https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lightning-rfc/blob/maste...
This repo contains specs for a lot of parts of the LN, although probably there may be changes I imagine.
As for code, one of the implementations, LND (Go): https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd/tree/master/routing but there are at least 3 other implementations in the works.
https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning (clang) https://github.com/ACINQ/eclair (Scala) https://github.com/mit-dci/lit (Go)
https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning https://github.com/ACINQ/eclair https://cdecker.github.io/lightning-integration/
I wouldn't call it vaporware. Yes, there are unsurprisingly open questions. But nothing which can't be solved.
1: https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd 2: https://github.com/ACINQ/eclair 3: https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning 4: https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lightning-rfc
That is completely false. Development of Lightning Network and other solutions by multiple teams has been steady and robust. To cite a few working on LN:
* https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning
* Lit: https://github.com/mit-dci/lit * Eclair: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=fr.acinq.eclai... * lnd: https://github.com/lightningnetwork/lnd * lightning-c: https://github.com/ElementsProject/lightning
Do these projects have the nicest UX? No. Is it fairly trivial to hook up a shiny UI to their RPC interfaces? Yes.
It's going to take a bit to roll out the infrastructure necessary, but a 1.7 MB block size is good enough until then. Especially if miners stop using ASICBOOST and mining near-empty blocks.