What is the difference between this and openscad?
I want to love openscad but it is hard to encapsulate and distribute code, as the library system is non existent.
Why is this better for stamping dies? I don't know much about it, but often wondered why there aren't cads specifically made for every fabrication style.
This appears to implement nontrivial features such as constraint solving and the ability to easily fillet edges.
I like the idea of programming geometry, but never got the hang of the OpenSCAD language. I eventually settled on JSCAD.
I've found CadQuery to be a nice replacement for OpenSCAD. The viewer isn't as good, but using CadQuery + Jupyter Notebook is real nice. And it does fillets/chamfers, plus you can reference geometry. Bit of a learning curve though
There is also CQ-editor which is a graphical frontend, but I did not manage to get the official release to run on Ubuntu 22 as it threw some import errors.
Cadquery is great, I use it to parametrically create parts for electronics libraries (so a lot of similar looking geometries with slightly different dimensions).
Since Jupyter-CadQuery [0] uses Juypter as an "editor", it's much more mature and stable. And if the viewer blows up, the notebook still works and can simply be reloaded. Debugging via replay is great.
It's also nice that you can install Jupyter-CadQuery on a different machine, either via Conda or Docker. And the standalone viewer looks awesome. It's a really exciting ecosystem.