> It is so intuitive and beautifully designed

No it's not. Significant whitespace, underscores that mean things, lack of type system (but people treat variables as typed anyway), et all, make it quite a difficult language to understand. And we won't get into performance problems that it's cult following turns a blind eye to.

I will say Python has inspired a generation of languages that got away from the C-inspired syntax. We're moved to critically thinking about _why_ we write code the way we do, rather than simply accepting things because "that's the way it's done" and for that we owe Python a great debt.

For a beginner, compared to many languages out there, it is very intuitive. I taught many 1st/2nd year college students Python as their first foray into programming, and it's flexibility and readability was a great way to get people in the door.

I won't defend beauty, as that's extremely subjective. I happen to find the whitespace significantly more intelligible than nested braces and parens, but that's me. I know plenty of people who strongly prefer to have braces and parens, so no argument from me.

Everyone loves to bring up performance as a huge drawback to Python, but it never holds up as a fundamental problem. Yes, that means for specific problems, it's not suitable. But the same can be said about many languages. Fortran is a horrible language to try and build a web framework on top of. Lisp is a bad language to write an OS in. Programming languages are tools, choose the right one for the job.

If you need blazing fast processing of numerical data, choose the proper tool. If you want fast iterative development with a broad set of packages and an active community, Python is a suitable tool.

I do agree that the growth in new languages is amazing, and greatly welcome them to the the toolbox that is programing and software development.

Beg to differ. Lisp machines were huge, back in the day, and there are still hobbyist projects like https://github.com/froggey/Mezzano