I've seen quite a few presentations, but never have I seen such a direct approach to showcasing the merit of RISCV. Well done.

I am really curious about the content of that article. I work closely with different embedded CPU architectures and in most of our multi-expert evalutions of RISC-V (from different suppliers) it could not compete with commercial offerings (avoiding names).

ksec

The author has been writing about RISC-V with relation to Apple M1 and basically fanboying about it. It is basically the same as some guy coming in and say Rust will overtake C and C++.

And yet the article got interest, since it align with the general public and main stream media view of RSIC-V being the rising star. It is free. It must be better. etc.

I could have repeat most of his point with OpenPOWER. ( microWatts [1] ) And for many application there are lot of reason why OpenPOWER are much better than RISC-V. ( Rather unfortunate IBM is loathed by lots of people in the industry )

[1] https://github.com/antonblanchard/microwatt