This is so cool! If new contributions to Ruby could be written in Rust, I'd be a lot more inclined to contribute. I don't think I'm alone here. Andy Kelley noted that the new Zig compiler has significantly more contributors, likely due to it being written in Zig and not C++.
Some people may roll their eyes at this, but it is a lot more enticing to work on a Rust codebase than a C/C++ one. I'm less likely to screw up and create a serious bug; I get a lot more help from the compiler; the build system is standardized and simple; and it's just plain fun.
> To be clear, it's OK to use Rust to implement YJIT (and other optional features in the future), but mainline CRuby will not be implemented in Rust.
- Matz, https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18481#note-14
On the other hand, there is Artichoke Ruby: https://github.com/artichoke/artichoke