> objectively incorrect choice of a Ctrl/Fn/Super/Alt layout instead of Fn/Ctrl/Super/Alt

That can be switched in bios.

I haven’t had any WiFi issues on Ubuntu that require turning it off and back on. The author seems to be using arch.

I wish we could choose one layout and then keep to it.

I mean, I am all open to an EU law here and I'm an not even joking.

Update: calm down, I only meant the Fn and Ctrl positions :)

That's still bad, at this point there are equally as many ctrl-fn fanatics, as fn-ctrl.

Option to adjust them in bios is perfect solution

Why a BIOS option? I don’t see why laptop keyboards can’t just ship with programmable firmwares.

I think ZSA is showing with their Oryx GUI just how easy it can be for an end user.

https://github.com/FrameworkComputer/EmbeddedController