And OpenAI continues to ship.

As promised, they released GPT3.5 fine-tuning today. They opened GPT4 API access a few months ago. In a few months, they'll release GPT4 fine-tuning.

Many favor open source AI, and criticize OpenAI for not being open enough. But the most important thing is, OpenAI innovates. Fast.

Llama, Bard, FB's open source stuff is good but it's lightyears behind OpenAI. You have to credit them for that.

Prior to LLaMA 2, I would have agreed with you but LLaMA 2 is a game changer. The 70B performance is probably between 3.5 and 4. But running it personally isn't cheap. The cheapest I found is about $4/hr to run the whole thing. I only spend around $3 on average a month on GPT-3.5 API for my personal stuff.

Out of curiosity and if you are happy to share, what is your 'personal stuff'?

As a counter reference, for my work I use it to code (for-4) and it has been between $70 and $200 per month depending on how heavily I use it

GPT-4 is significantly more expensive so I can definitely see you spending that amount. For really complex stuff, I switch over the GPT-4 and it will cost me almost $3 a "question" (as in going from the beginning to solving it). Honestly worth it since it solves my problem but it adds up quick so I try to stick with 3.5 when I can.

Can’t you get by with ChatGPT-4 for these personal assistant type questions? That’s what I do and my 20 a month goes a long way. I’d be interested to see if I am missing out on anything using GPT to is way in contrast to the API.

I use it with a tool that is wired into my terminal that changes my files for me [1]. That alone makes me several times more productive compared to copy pasting back and forth between the chat window. If the chat window makes me twice as productive the command line tool probably makes me 5x as productive. At that kind of output on a developer salary the $70-200 a month is absolute peanuts compared to what you get in return

1: https://github.com/paul-gauthier/aider